Bring me the situation that does not quite add up.
A consequential technology decision. A transformation losing direction. A proposal that deserves a second view. An operating problem crossing too many organisational boundaries.
We can start there.
You do not need to prepare a polished brief. Share enough context for me to understand the situation. If I believe I can materially help, we can decide what the next conversation should involve.
Confidentiality matters.
You do not need to disclose sensitive technical or commercial information through this form.
The problem crosses more than one box.
- A major technology decision needs an independent view.
- A transformation is no longer behaving as expected.
- Supplier claims, architecture and business reality do not agree.
- Cost, resilience or operational risk has become difficult to explain.
- Ownership is fragmented across technology, security, operations or suppliers.
- AI or infrastructure ambition is moving faster than governance.
Tell me enough to understand the situation.
Useful context includes the organisation, what is happening, where the uncertainty sits, and what a good outcome would look like.
Do not send confidential architecture diagrams, credentials, regulated data or sensitive commercial material through the form.
hello@pavel-stoyanov.com
Europe · International
Remote-first · On-site where it materially changes the outcome
DISCREET IN CONFIDENCE. CANDID IN JUDGEMENT.
Initial conversations are exploratory. If I do not believe there is a meaningful way for me to improve the situation, I will say so.
Bring the decision, transformation or operating problem.
We can establish whether an independent view, structured challenge or direct intervention would materially improve the outcome.